MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393925175 · doi:10.1055/a-2299-4409

Expectant Management of a Triploid Partial Molar Pregnancy at 26 Weeks' Gestation: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4393925175 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Wong, Mohannad Ali, Marc Stalder, Brigitte Bonin, Darine El‐Chaâr

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
KeywordsGestationObstetricsExpectant managementMolarPregnancyMedicineMolar pregnancyGynecologyBiologyDentistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Triploid partial molar pregnancies are not viable, and confer maternal risks including preeclampsia, hemorrhage, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, and trophoblastic embolization. We report a case managed expectantly until 26 weeks' gestation in a patient requesting continuation of pregnancy. Case Presentation This G2P1 presented with fetal anomalies indicative of triploid partial molar pregnancy. The pregnancy was complicated by anemia, hyperthyroidism, supraventricular tachycardia, and threatened preterm labor. Her care involved maternal fetal medicine collaborating with internal medicine, palliative care, anesthesia and critical care. Labor was augmented at 26 weeks' gestation, resulting in vaginal delivery. Postpartum course was notably complicated by acute respiratory distress in the immediate postpartum period, which self-resolved. Postpartum hemorrhage and retained products of conception were additional complications. Conclusion This unique case highlights the role of multidisciplinary collaboration and shared decision making in challenging circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Perinatology ReportsSame topicGestational Trophoblastic Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207