MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393937304 · doi:10.12907/978-3-593-44566-3

Arktisches Wissen

2021· book· de· W4393937304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lea Pfäffli

Bibliographic record

VenueCampus Verlag eBooks · 2021
Typebook
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Als sich der Wettlauf um Nordwestpassage und Nordpol im frühen 20. Jahrhundert verschärfte, suchte die dänische Administration Grönlands nach Verbündeten. Als Zulieferer kolonialen Wissens rekrutierte sie Schweizer Naturforscher, die sich ihrerseits als nationale Polarhelden vermarkteten. An welche Auflagen waren die Forschungsreisenden aus der Schweiz in der Arktis gebunden? Wie kontrollierte die dänische Handelsgesellschaft den Kontakt der Außenseiter zur lokalen Bevölkerung, den Inuit? Wer finanzierte die Expeditionen? Lea Pfäffli erzählt eine transimperiale Geschichte arktischen Wissens und leuchtet dabei Kolonialreich und Nation neu aus. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCampus Verlag eBooksSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207