MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393956180 · doi:10.46692/9781529210668.002

Introduction: Framing the Study

2023· other· en· W4393956180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Narayanan Ganapathy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in Asia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraming (construction)Political scienceMedia studiesGeographySociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is a qualitative study of a monoethnic Malay Muslim gang, Omega, which has its roots in the Singapore prisons. It remains one of the most important secret societies in postcolonial Singapore, albeit a racially exclusive one, having gained much control over the illicit drug trade in the country and in the Southeast Asian region since the 1990s, though the scale of its activities seems to have diminished over the last decade. This study aims to examine the genesis of the gang and its processes of gang membership and initiation, structure, organization and activities, as well as behavioural traits of its members. While the Omega gang outwardly operates with strong ethnoreligious overtones through the incorporation of Islamic doctrines to create a form of ‘Muslim brotherhood’ in the criminal underworld, its existence is also very much about how Malays as a racial minority in Singapore have responded to latent marginalization and hangovers of colonial racialization by organizing themselves into gangs in order to seek material success. Akin to many racial minority groups elsewhere (such as African Americans in the United States, African Caribbeans in Britain and the Indigenous populations of Australasia), Malays are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system and often caught in the vicious cycle of arrest–incarceration–re-arrest (Travis et al, 2001). While much has been written about racial disparities in crime in Western countries such as Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, much less is known about this phenomenon and of the complex and often contested relationship between race and crime in Singapore, an affluent multiracial and multicultural society. This book attempts to address some of the gaps in the current literature and to contribute to a better understanding of this significant but rather obscure dimension of Singapore society. In theoretical terms, a functionalist-structuralist perspective takes the position that racial disparity in crime in general and the disproportionate involvement of visible minorities in gangs in particular are a result of the structural marginalization of racial minorities. By treating the Omega gang as a microcosm of the larger socioeconomic and political dynamics of a settler society, the functionalist-structuralist view contextualizes the historical and structural consequences of colonization, industrialization, modernization and socioeconomic disempowerment which have converged to produce an ethnic Malay underclass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0140.014
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocioeconomic Development in AsiaFrench-language works237,207