MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393970841 · doi:10.1002/9781119763222.ch3

Equivalence Principle and Integral Equations in Layered Media

2024· other· en· W4393970841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Boundary Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquivalence (formal languages)MathematicsIntegral equationMathematical analysisCalculus (dental)Pure mathematicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computation of the electromagnetic fields in the presence of the objects embedded in layered media requires solution of the Maxwell equations constrained with appropriate boundary conditions. Two commonly used techniques for evaluation of electromagnetic fields in multilayered structures are the integral equation method and the differential equation methods based on the finite-element and finite-difference discretization. The integral equation method relies on the availability of the layered medium Green's functions which the structure is embedded in and, thus, has ability to localize the unknown quantities to the surfaces of only the conductors and finite dielectric insertions in the layers. In this chapter the authors present detailed derivation of such integral equations formulations suitable for solution of both static and full-wave problems. They review the reciprocity relation, which is key to formulation of the equivalence principle and integral equations for the quasi-electrostatic fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it