MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393970855 · doi:10.1002/9781119763222.ch12

Surface‐Volume–Surface Electric Field Integral Equation

2024· other· en· W4393970855 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface (topology)Electric-field integral equationVolume (thermodynamics)Electric fieldField (mathematics)Electric fluxSurface integralIntegral equationMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMechanicsGeometryThermodynamicsPure mathematicsOptical fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter helps the reader to understand the system of coupled volume integral equation, Mixed-Potential-Integral-Equation (MPIE), and Surface-Volume-Surface-electric field integral equation (SVS-EFIE) formulated for composite metal–dielectric objects embedded in layered media and featuring both piece-wise homogeneous regions, inhomogeneous regions, and metal regions. It derives elements for impedance matrix resulting from Method of Moments (MoM) discretization of SVS-EFIE. Coupled system of SVS-EFIE, MPIE, and volume integral equation enables solution of the scattering and radiation problems involving realistic composite metal–dielectric models with piece-wise and inhomogeneous dielectric regions embedded in a multilayered media. MoM discretization of such models involves volumetric meshes (e.g. tetrahedral ones) representing dielectric regions and surface meshes (e.g. triangle ones) representing the metal regions and surfaces bounding the piece-wise homogeneous dielectric regions. Michalski-Zheng's theory allows reduction of the singularity in the scalar potential part of the electric field Green's function to 1/R strength through use of divergence and gradient theorems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207