MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393971115 · doi:10.1002/9781119763222.ch4

Canonical Problems of Vertical and Horizontal Dipoles Radiation in Layered Media

2024· other· en· W4393971115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorizontal and verticalDipoleRadiationGeometryGeodesyGeologyPhysicsMathematicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter demonstrates solution of canonical dipole radiation problems in layered media foundational to the definition of both the potential and field dyadic Green's functions. Spectral solutions of the vertical dipole and horizontal dipoles are presented in the analytic form in case of simple layered media. These solutions are also used to demonstrate the definitions of the boundary value problems both in spectral and spatial domains in case of general layered media. The chapter also introduces the reader to the multivaluedness of Green's function spectral as the functions of the lateral wavenumber k p and transversal wavenumbers k z and their definitions in the form of Riemann surfaces. It then considers the problem of four-layer medium backed with a PEC half-space (ground plane) excited by the horizontal electric dipole situated in the upper half-space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods in inverse problemsFrench-language works237,207