MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393972892 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348330

COSMOGLOBE DR1 results

2024· article· en· W4393972892 on OpenAlexaff
Duncan J. Watts, U. Fuskeland, R. Aurlien, A. Basyrov, L. A. Bianchi, M. Brilenkov, H. K. Eriksen, K. S. F. F. Guimarães, M. Galloway, E. Gjerløw, Brandon S. Hensley, L. T. Hergt, D. Herman, H. T. Ihle, K. Lee, J. G. S. Lunde, S. Nerval, M. San, Nils-Ole Stutzer, H. Thommesen, I. K. Wehus

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAstrophysics Science DivisionEuropean Research CouncilGoddard Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNorges ForskningsrådEuropean CommissionJet Propulsion Laboratory
KeywordsCMB cold spotSkySynchrotronPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyCosmic microwave backgroundNuclear physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first model of full-sky polarized synchrotron emission that is derived from all WMAP and Planck LFI frequency maps. The basis of this analysis is the set of end-to-end reprocessed C OSMOGLOBE Data Release 1 (DR1) sky maps presented in a companion paper, which have significantly lower instrumental systematics than the legacy products from each experiment. We find that the resulting polarized synchrotron amplitude map has an average noise rms per 2° full width at half maximum (FWHM) beam of 3.2 μK at 30 GHz. This is 30% lower than the recently released B EYOND P LANCK model that included only LFI+WMAP Ka – V data, and 29% lower than the WMAP K -band map alone. The mean B -to- E power spectrum ratio is 0.39 ± 0.02, with amplitudes consistent with those measured previously by Planck and QUIJOTE. Assuming a power law model for the synchrotron spectral energy distribution and using the T – T plot method, we find a full-sky inverse noise-variance-weighted mean of the synchrotron polarized spectral index of β s = −3.07 ± 0.07 from the C OSMOGLOBE DR1 K band and 30 GHz, in good agreement with previous estimates. In summary, the novel C OSMOGLOBE DR1 synchrotron model is both more sensitive and systematically cleaner than similar previous models, and it has a more complete error description that is defined by a set of Monte Carlo posterior samples. We believe that these products are preferable over previous Planck and WMAP products for all synchrotron-related scientific applications, including simulations, forecasting, and component separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207