MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393974282 · doi:10.3138/ctr.196.007

Transformational Voice Work: Using Theatre-Based Vocal Practice to Support Gender-Diverse Voices

2024· article· en· W4393974282 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jane Macfarlane

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Music Education Insights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipVoice TrainingWork (physics)Visual artsPsychologyCommunicationSociologyGender studiesAestheticsArtSocial psychologyEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a voice coach and teacher, Jane MacFarlane guides actors to a greater understanding of how their voice works, to reveal a character that is rooted in truth and believability. The foundation of the work she does is based on Kristin Linklater’s Freeing the Natural Voice, which identifies habits and patterns of tension in the body that can limit the range of our voices and employs techniques to access the fullness and richness of the vocal qualities we are born possessing. A few years ago, MacFarlane was approached by a colleague who was transitioning and wanted to know if voice work could help her find a vocal quality that affirmed her gender. They began crafting a progression through the voice work that helped her find a voice that felt organic and true to who she really is. Through working with her on her journey, MacFarlane became associated with Skipping Stone, a transgender support organization in Calgary. Together, they began to offer online classes that were based on the work MacFarlane does with theatre practice and applied it to the needs of the transgender community. This article outlines the process of the eight-week progression for vocal feminization through Skipping Stone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicDiverse Music Education InsightsFrench-language works237,207