MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393974301 · doi:10.3138/ctr.196.004

Voice Coaching at the Stratford Festival: A Vocation of Service

2024· article· en· W4393974301 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Paul de Jong, Janine Pearson, Danielle Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingVisual artsService (business)ArtAestheticsHistorySociologyPsychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Saturday, 22 October 2022, longtime Stratford voice and text coaches Paul de Jong, Cathy MacKinnon, and Janine Pearson discussed and reflected on the role of the voice coach at the Stratford Festival with Danielle Wilson. The Stratford festival is the only festival in Canada with a coaching team, and the coaches share their thoughts on the history, value, role, and purpose of voice coaches at the festival and in what ways they serve the work of the actor. The coaches also reflect on how voice work is evolving and how we might encourage the next generation of voice coaches to enter the profession.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207