MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393974352 · doi:10.3138/ctr.196.006

Say It Loud: A Round Table of IBPOC Accent Coaches

2024· article· en· W4393974352 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eric Armstrong, Joy Lanceta Coronel, Lisa Cromarty, Michelle Lopez Rios, Alicia Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Table (database)ArtPsychologyVisual artsSpeech recognitionComputer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Monday, 7 February 2022, five accent coaches gathered on Zoom for a round table discussion about accent training for racialized actors. Eric Armstrong, a professor at York University’s Department of Theatre and Performance, had invited the four guest accent/language coaches to discuss the needs of actors-in-training from Indigenous, Black, Asian, Latinx, and other communities. The coaches had all served as guest teachers for the racialized students in Armstrong’s fourth-year BFA accents class. The panellists shared their thoughts with the audience of roughly 135 on what can be done to make the teaching/learning environment both safe and effective for racialized students, and how we can build greater capacity, so that there are more coaches/teachers from diverse backgrounds in education and the industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207