Label-Free Analysis of Protein Biomarkers Using Pattern-Optimized Graphene-Nanopyramid SERS for the Rapid Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quantitative and highly sensitive detection of biomarkers such as Tau proteins and Aβ polypeptides is considered one of the most effective methods for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) detection is a promising method that faces, however, challenges like insufficient sensitivity due to the non-optimized nanostructures for specialized analyte sizes and insufficient control of the location of SERS hot spots. Thus, the SERS detection of AD biomarkers is restricted. We reported here an in-depth study of the analytical Raman enhancement factor (EF) of the wafer-scale graphene-Au nanopyramid hybrid SERS substrates using a combination of both theoretical calculation and experimental measurements. Experimental results show that larger nanopyramids and smaller gap spacing lead to a larger SERS EF, with an optimized analytical EF up to 1.1 × 10 10 . The hybrid SERS substrate exhibited detection limits of 10 –15 M for Tau and phospho-Tau (P-Tau) proteins and 10 –14 M for Aβ polypeptides, respectively. Principal component analysis correctly categorized the SERS spectra of different biomarkers at ultralow concentrations (10 –13 M) using the optimized substrate. Amide III bands at 1200–1300 cm –1 reflect different structural conformations of proteins or polypeptides. Tau and P-Tau proteins are inherently disordered with a few α-helix residuals. The structure of Aβ42 polypeptides transitioned from the α-helix to the β-sheet as the concentration increased. These results demonstrate that the hybrid SERS method could be a simple and effective way for the label-free detection of protein biomarkers to enable the rapid early diagnosis of AD and other diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".