Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome: A Rare Cause of Gastrointestinal Polyposis With Response to Emerging Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 70-year-old man presented to the clinic with a 6-month history of dysgeusia, followed by chronic, non-bloody diarrhea and 45 lb unintentional weight loss. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy discovered confluent nodularity in the gastric antrum and examined duodenum, but a normal esophagus. Colonoscopy uncovered patches of polypoid nodular mucosa throughout the entire colon. Biopsies of the nodular mucosa were consistent with hamartomatous polyps while biopsies of the intervening, normal-appearing mucosa demonstrated edema with crypt architectural distortion. Other hereditary polyposis syndromes were excluded with genetic testing, confirming a diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome. Adalimumab therapy was initiated with clinical improvement after nonresponse to prednisone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".