Modeling the Nexus between European Carbon Emission Trading and Financial Market Returns: Practical Implications for Carbon Risk Reduction and Hedging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The carbon–financial nexus helps firms evaluate susceptibility to carbon risk more effectively. This is the first research article to model the short- and long-run co-integrating association between European financial markets, the CBOE oil price volatility index (OVZ) and the European carbon emission trading system (EU-ETS) by using the daily returns from 1 October 2013 to 1 October 2023. We utilize co-integration test followed by the ARDL framework with an error correction mechanism (ECM). Moreover, we utilize the DCC-GARCH-t copula framework to estimate the hedge ratio and to select an optimal portfolio weight for carbon risk hedging. Overall, the findings suggested that EU-ETS (OVZ) has a consistent positive (negative) short-term influence on all the equity returns of Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and the stock indices of the whole Eurozone. However, in the long term, EU-ETS has a positive (negative) effect on the stock returns of France and the Eurozone (Belgium and Spain). Belgian and Spanish companies could implement long-term carbon reduction policies. Belgian and Spanish firms should focus on the utilization of green energy resources and the internalization of carbon emission-free mechanical processes as this may offer a safeguard against the additional pressure arising from escalating carbon prices. Finally, an optimal portfolio weight selection strategy based upon the DCC-GARCH-t copula approach aims for higher hedging effectiveness (HE) than the hedge ratio strategy when adopting short-term positions in Italian and Danish equity markets to reduce the risk of long-term EU-ETS volatility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".