MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393997446 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02933

The best watering hole in town: Characteristics of ponds used by an endangered bat in an urbanizing boreal landscape

2024· article· en· W4393997446 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Piia M. Kukka, Hannah A. Miller, Julie P. Thomas, Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow, Thomas S. Jung

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Conservation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsYukon UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaYukon Department of Environment
FundersGouvernement du Yukon
KeywordsEndangered speciesHabitatWetlandEcologyBiodiversityMyotis lucifugusGeographyBorealWildlifeEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small waterbodies, or ‘ponds’, have an important role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services, particularly where freshwater sources are limited, such as arid or some urban environments. However, studies that examine the use of ponds by terrestrial wildlife are limited. In the boreal forest, aquatic habitats are important drinking and feeding habitat for endangered little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus), and their relative value likely varies based on their characteristics, such as size, adjacent land cover type, anthropogenic disturbance, and proximity to other water bodies. We examined the characteristics of ponds used by little brown bats along an urban-rural gradient in Yukon, Canada. We used ultrasonic detectors to sample 99 ponds and generalized linear mixed models to determine whether ponds with certain characteristics received more bat activity than others. We found that ponds are important habitat for little brown bats, as 98% of the ponds we sampled were used. Bats selected ponds based on local rather than landscape level factors, and there was less bat activity at ponds surrounded by additional open water/wetland habitat, which was contrary to our prediction. Ponds that were surrounded by additional open water/wetland habitat may have been too exposed for bats at high latitudes, where nights are short and not completely dark. Isolated ponds that are darker, such as those surrounded by mature forest, may be particularly valuable for little brown bats at high latitudes that exhibit risk-sensitive foraging. We suggest that ponds of comparatively high value for endangered little brown bats be further identified and that these ponds be protected from development, draining, and degradation, and the surrounding mature forest remains intact. More broadly, recognition and conservation of ponds and their surroundings as key habitat for species of bats requires further attention. Understanding the characteristics of ponds selected by threatened bats can help inform conservation priorities and measures that ensure the aquatic habitats they require are maintained in developing landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and ConservationSame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207