Exploring the evolutionary mechanism of hepatitis B and gastric cancer based on Mendelian randomization combined with bioinformatics analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) infection appears to be associated with extrahepatic cancers. This study aims to evaluate the causality and evolutionary mechanism of chronic HBV infection and gastric cancer through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and bioinformatics analysis. We conducted 2-sample MR to investigate the causal relationship between chronic HBV infection and gastric cancer. We identified 5 independent genetic variants closely associated with exposure (chronic HBV infection) as instrumental variables in a sample of 1371 cases and 2938 controls of East Asian descent in Korea. The genome wide association study (GWAS) data for the outcome variable came from the Japanese Biobank. Bioinformatics analysis was used to explore the evolutionary mechanism of chronic HBV infection and gastric cancer. Differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were performed to identify key targets that are commonly associated with both diseases, and their biological functions were investigated. Multiple machine-learning models were employed to select hub genes. The MR analysis showed a positive causal relationship between chronic HBV infection and gastric cancer (IVW: OR = 1.165, 95% CI = 1.085-1.250, P < .001), and the result was robust in sensitivity analysis. According to the bioinformatics analysis, the 5 key targets were mainly enriched in Toll-like receptor signaling and PI3K-Akt signaling. Two hub genes, CXCL9 and COL6A2, were identified, and a high-performing predictive model was constructed. Chronic HBV infection is positively associated with gastric cancer, and the evolutionary mechanism may be related to Toll-like receptor signaling. Prospective studies are still needed to confirm these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".