De la critique théorique à la critique de la société : penser le concept de réification chez Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, j’examine les points de rencontre possibles entre l’oeuvre de Deleuze et Guattari et la théorie critique de l’École de Francfort afin d’établir leur complémentarité. L’hypothèse que je défends est que c’est à partir d’un concept phare de la théorie critique, la réification, qu’il est possible d’opérer un rapprochement productif entre les penseurs de l’École de Francfort et Deleuze et Guattari. Dans la première partie, le concept de réification et le rôle que celui-ci a joué dans la pensée critique allemande sont présentés (Marx, Lukács, Adorno). Cet exercice doit permettre de mesurer la pertinence du concept de réification pour établir une double critique : critique théorique et critique de la société. Dans la seconde partie, je montre comment cette double critique traverse la pensée deleuzo-guattarienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.048 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".