Utilizing Science and Technology in Agriculture to Ensure the Enhancement of Quality of Life Through Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Sustainable Livelihoods.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ensuring food, nutrition, and income security is of paramount importance for India, a country where over 50 percent of the workforce is employed in agriculture, contributing approximately 17 percent to the GDP.Food security encompasses more than just production availability; it encompasses ensuring nutritional well-being for the populace and financial stability for farmers.Throughout history, agricultural advancements driven by science and technology have significantly influenced India's agricultural land scape, spanning various revolutions such as the green, white, blue, rainbow, and golden revolutions.India has achieved notable progress in terms of agricultural production, productivity, and availability of essential commodities like food grains, horticul tural produce, milk, meat, and fish, largely owing to technology-driven development and governmental initiatives.The Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare has spearheaded flagship programs and production -oriented schemes like the National Food Security Mission and the National Mission on Oilseeds, aimed at promoting technology adoption and bridging yield gaps.However, amidst a scenario of increasing population and diminishing land and water resources due to climate change, the challenges are growing.Climate change is expected to exacerbate issues such as high temperatures, unpredictable weather patterns, the emergence of new pests and diseases, and threats such as rising sea levels and glacier melt.Addressing these challenges requires robust suppor t for research and development to deliver science-based solutions that enhance the quality of life for all, including farmers who not only produce food but also rely on it for their livelihoods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".