Study of schistosomiasis transmission models (mathematical analysis, states reconstruction and parameters estimation)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'objectif de cette thèse est l'analyse mathématique et l'estimation des paramètres de modèles de métapopulation de la bilharziose. A partir du modèle de base de Macdonald, nous expliquons en détail comment ces modèles sont construits. Nous faisons leur analyse mathématique complète à partir du nombre de reproduction du calcul du nombre de reproduction de base R0. Nous montrons que si R0 est inférieur ou égal à 1 alors l'équilibre sans maladie est globalement asymptotiquement stable. Dans le cas où R0 est strictement plus grand que 1 nous montrons l'existence et l'unicité de l'équilibre endémique et prouvons ensuite que ce dernier est globalement asymptotiquement stable. La plupart des variables et paramètres de modèles mathématiques étant inconnus, nous proposons, dans notre travail, des méthodes de calibration par les observateurs : la méthode du Moving Horizon State Estimation ou MHSE et celle de l'observateur grand gain. Une application de ces deux méthodes sera faite sur le modèle de Macdonald
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".