MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394013901 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v8i2.1570

Soutenir le développement professionnel d’intervenant.e.s école-famille-communauté en milieu défavorisé montréalais : faire dialoguer pratique, accompagnement et recherche

2024· article· fr· W4394013901 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Johanne Cyr, Lude Pierre, Dominic Denis, Martin Roussel, Geneviève Audet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalScience pour tous
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une école montréalaise pour tous (UÉMPT) est un programme ministériel dont la mission est de contribuer à la réussite éducative de tous les élèves issu.e.s des milieux défavorisés montréalais. Depuis 2021, nous animons un groupe de codéveloppement à l’intérieur duquel des personnes intervenantes école-famille-communauté (IÉFC), des ressources professionnelles d’UÉMPT et une chercheuse universitaire interrogent les contours du rôle d’IÉFC et les manières dont il se déploie spécifiquement en contexte défavorisé montréalais. Dans cet article, nous mettrons en lumière comment, en faisant dialoguer pratique, accompagnement et recherche, nous considérons soutenir le développement professionnel des personnes participantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207