MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394025567 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10028573

Data for "Early planting adaptation makes the coupled food-water system more sustainable under climate change"

2023· dataset· en· W4394025567 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Zhang, Yanping Li, Cenlin He, Fei Chen, Prasanth Valayamkunnath, Zhenhua Li, Li Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Climate changeSowingClimate change adaptationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementAgricultural engineeringWater resource managementAgronomyEcologyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data for submission "Early planting adaptation makes the coupled food-water system more sustainable under climate change" All data are in netcdf format and can be read in ncl, python, R code capacity. geo_em.d01.conus.corn: Domain setup file for the Noah-MP crop model in the US corn belt. Lat/lon location specified by "XLAT_M" and "XLONG_M" variable and corn planting area specified by "CROPTYPE" variable. Three zip files are uploaded containing data from model simulations and county-level yield and irrigation record: Yield_data.zip: yield data from model simulations (denoted by three scenarios, CTRL, PGW, TAVE), with irrigation (irr), and from USDA NASS (NASS). Irrigation_data.zip: Irrigation amount data from three scenarios (CTRL, PGW, TAVE for early planting), and from USGS water use record (2005 and 2010). TempPrecPET.zip: temperature and precipitation and potential evapotranspiration data (PET) for the CTRL and PGW climate scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.136

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207