A consolidated database of police-reported motor vehicle traffic accidents in the United States for actuarial applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This database is related to "A CONSOLIDATED DATABASE OF POLICE-REPORTED MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES FOR ACTUARIAL APPLICATIONS" (Araiza Iturria C.A., Hardy M., Marriott P.). Author Information A. Author Name: Carlos Andrés Araiza Iturria Email: caraizai@uwaterloo.ca B. Co-author Name: Mary Hardy Email: mary.hardy@uwaterloo.ca C. Co-author Name: Paul Marriott Email: pmarriott@uwaterloo.ca Institution: University of Waterloo Address: 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Funding granted by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Hardy: RGPIN-2018-03754, Marriott: RGPIN-2020-04015. The Python scripts to create the database can be directly accessed through related identifiers in this page. Parameter estimates along with their 90% confidence intervals from the 20 multinomial logistic regressions can be seen through related identifiers in this page.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.051 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".