MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394038599 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5608535

Data and code from: Healthy young adults use distinct gait strategies to enhance stability when walking on mild slopes and when altering arm swing

2021· dataset· en· W4394038599 on OpenAlexaff
Mary-Elise L MacDonald, Tarique Siragy, Allen Hill, Julie Nantel

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwingGaitCode (set theory)Physical medicine and rehabilitationStability (learning theory)Computer sciencePsychologyMedicineEngineeringMachine learningProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains the Julia code, Jupyter notebook, and data used in the study “Healthy young adults use distinct gait strategies to enhance stability when walking on mild slopes and when altering arm swing” by MacDonald et al. <strong>Instructions</strong> To run this analysis on your computer, both Julia and Jupyter Notebook must be installed. A version of Julia appropriate for your OS can be downloaded from the Julia website, and Jupyter can be installed from within Julia (in the REPL) with <pre><code>] add IJulia</code></pre> Alternate instructions for installing Jupyter can be found on the IJulia github or the Jupyter homepage (not recommended). From within the main repository directory, start Julia and then start Jupyter in the Julia REPL <pre><code>using IJulia notebook(;dir=pwd())</code></pre> or if using a system Jupyter installation, start Jupyter from your favorite available shell (e.g. Powershell on Windows, bash on any *nix variant, etc.). In Jupyter, open the <code>notebooks/analysis.ipynb</code> notebook. Running all cells will reproduce the results for this paper. <strong>Description of data</strong> The <code>data</code> directory contains all the data used in the production of the results which were statistically tested. Each <code>.mat</code> file contains events and data generated in Visual3D: Events <code>LTO</code>/<code>RTO</code> (Left/right toe-off) <code>LHS</code>/<code>RHS</code> (Left/right heel-strike) <code>HIST</code>/<code>HIEN</code> (Hilly start/end) <code>ROST</code>/<code>ROEN</code> (Rocky start/end) <code>MLST</code>/<code>MLEN</code> (ML translation start/end) Data <code>LFootPos</code>/<code>RFootPos</code> (Left/right foot COM position) <code>TrunkPos/TrunkVel</code>/<code>TrunkAcc</code> (Trunk COM position, velocity, and acceleration) <code>HeadPos/HeadVel</code>/<code>HeadAcc</code> (Head COM position, velocity, and acceleration) <code>COG</code> (Whole-body COM/COG) The <code>.csv</code> files contain system state of the CAREN system produced by D-Flow software, which includes various system and software settings, most pertinent of which is the treadmill speed. The <code>.c3d</code> files contain the raw motion capture data from Vicon Nexus. The results of the <code>notebooks/analysis.ipynb</code> notebook are found in the <code>results</code> folder. Please see the paper for a list of the dependent variables and statistical analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207