MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394053714 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10458185

30-Year Canadian Fire Weather Index Simulations over Europe: CMIP6-Informed Temperature and Precipitation Perturbations

2024· dataset· en· W4394053714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Siham El Garroussi

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationClimatologyEnvironmental scienceIndex (typography)MeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesGeographyGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset integrates a 30-year Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI), generated using the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast model, forced by ERA5 reanalysis data (1981-2010). These simulations incorporate perturbations in temperature and precipitation forcings based on CMIP6 climate projections under the SSP2-4.5 medium mitigation scenario. The perturbed forcings were produced by modifying the daily temperature and precipitation data from ERA5 for the period of control from 1980 to 2010, using monthly factors that were estimated from a combination of climate change signals obtained from CMIP6 multi-model simulations, along with mean annual perturbations. The perturbation for temperature was constructed as an additive factor, varying from 0°C to 5°C with an increment of 1°C, added to the projected temperature under the SSP2-4.5 climate scenario. The perturbation for precipitation was constructed as a multiplicative factor, ranging from 0.6 to 1.6 with an increment of 0.2. The dataset offers daily FWI values across Europe, with a 31 km resolution, for each perturbation scenario over three decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207