MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394054717 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4670689

NICER PSR J0740+6620 Illinois-Maryland MCMC Samples

2021· dataset· en· W4394054717 on OpenAlexaff
M. Coleman Miller, Frederick K. Lamb, Alexander J. Dittmann, Slavko Bogdanov, Zaven Arzoumanian, Keith C. Gendreau, Sébastien Guillot, Wynn C. G. Ho, James M. Lattimer, Sharon M. Morsink, Paul S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, Sridhar Manthripragada, C. B. Markwardt, Takashi Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cognard, H. Thankful Cromartie, Emmanuel Fonseca, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, A. Parthasarathy, Timothy T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, Michael Loewenstein

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Posterior samples from the Illinois-Maryland analysis of NICER and XMM-Newton data for PSR J0030+0451. Files ending in "RM" contain only equatorial circumferential radius and gravitational mass posterior samples. Files ending in "full" contain the full set of posterior samples from each analysis. Files starting with "NICER-only" contain samples from the analysis of NICER data alone.<br> Files starting with "NICER+XMM" contain samples from the joint NICER + XMM analysis, assuming no relative calibration offset between the instruments.<br> Files starting with "NICER+XMM-relative" contain samples from the joint NICER + XMM analysis, allowing for up to a +-10% offset in the relative calibration between the instruments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.104

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207