MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

KAJIAN POTENSI GALIAN MINERAL KAOLIN DI KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR PROVINSI RIAU

2024· article· en· W4394061391 on OpenAlex
Monalisa Hasibuan, Anton Suprojo Hadiyanto, Indra Agus Lukman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSelodang Mayang Jurnal Ilmiah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Riau Province is rich in natural resources in the form of minerals, coal, oil, gas, and alternative energy sources. For natural resources to be utilized more optimally, careful planning is needed in their management. As is known, wealth in the mining and energy sectors is generally a non-renewable natural resource and therefore needs to be managed properly and correctly, so that it can provide benefits for development and prosperity to the community. The development of minerals, especially non-metallic minerals, needs to be packaged in an integrated systematic manner in the mineral resource management system as one of the basic capital to produce optimal added value to increase regional income in Indragiri Hilir Regency. This research aims to determine the potential distribution of Kaolin mineral minerals obtained from a survey conducted by the Riau Province Energy and Mineral Resources Service in Indragiri Hilir Regency, Riau Province. This research method is based on a study of secondary data obtained from the results of a survey carried out by the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources in 2013. Literature search for journal articles that support this research and statutory regulations. The potential of kaolin minerals in Kab. Indragiri Hilir is located in Lubuk Besar Village, District. Keritang and Sencalang Village, District. Reteh. The total volume of hypothetical kaolin resources at the two locations is 1,100,000 m3.
 
 Provinsi Riau kaya akan sumber daya alam berupa bahan galian mineral, batubara, minyak, gas dan sumber energi alternatif. Sumber daya alam agar dimanfaatkan lebih optimal, diperlukan perencanaan yang matang dalam pengelolaannya. Sebagaimana diketahui bahwa kekayaan di sektor pertambangan dan energi pada umumnya merupakan sumber daya alam yang tidak dapat diperbaharui, untuk itu perlu dikelola dengan baik dan benar, agar dapat memberikan manfaat bagi pembangunan dan kemakmuran kepada masyarakat. Pengembangan mineral, khususnya mineral non logam perlu dikemas secara sistemis terpadu dalam sistem manajemen sumber daya mineral sebagai salah satu modal dasar untuk menghasilkan nilai tambah secara optimal guna peningkatan pendapatan daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui potensi sebaran galian mineral Kaolin yang diperoleh dari survey yang telah di lakukan Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Provinsi Riau di Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Provinsi Riau. Metode penelitian ini berdasarkan kajian data sekunder yang diperoleh dari hasil survey yang dilaksanakan oleh Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral tahun 2013. Penelusuran literatur artikel jurnal yang mendukung penelitian ini dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Potensi mineral kaolin di Kab. Indragiri Hilir terdapat di Desa Lubuk Besar, Kec. Keritang dan Desa Sencalang, Kec. Reteh. Total volume sumberdaya hipotetik kaolin pada kedua lokasi tersebut yaitu 1.100.000 m3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it