Information & data files concerning a study of the Confinement of Ultrarelativistic Electron Remnant Belts to Low L-shells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
These Information files and data files should be considered with our paper "On the Confinement of Ultrarelativistic Electron Remnant Belts to Low L-shells" by V. Pinto, X.-J. Zhang, D. Mourenas, et al., to appear the Journal of Geophysical Research-Space Physics. They include a PDF file "Information..." that details the 18 considered events of remnant belts of ultra-relativistic electrons observed in 2012-2017 by the Van Allen Probes and the method of production of the data files, There are also data files of ULF wave power as a function of time for the different pairs of stations provided in "date-power-new+" dat files (in the "ULFWavePower.zip" file). LANL* LCDS calculations for the considered periods are provided in "Lmax-date-Txx" txt files (in the "LANL-LCDS.zip" file) for T96 and T05 magnetic field models (xx in file name indicating the UT hour of start and LCDS being calculated in steps of 5 min). The electron PSD profiles obtained from the Van Allen Probes during/nearby each event are provided in the "PSD-VanAllenProbes" PDF file. All the data used here are freely available from different repositories (see below). We gratefully acknowledge Van Allen Probes ECT-REPT/MagEIS and EMFISIS data freely available from https://www.rbsp-ect.lanl.gov/ and https://emfisis.physics.uiowa.edu/data/. We are also grateful to S. Mende and C.T. Russell for the Prince George and Athabasca magnetometer data from the THEMIS GMAG network freely available at http://themis.igpp.ucla.edu/gmag_desc.shtml (where magnetometer data from the following stations are also available), the AUTUMNX magnetometer network funded through the Canadian Space Agency Geospace Observatory for the Athabasca University magnetometer data at http://autumn.athabascau.ca/, the Tromso Geophysical Observatory, University of Tromsož Norway, for the Dombas magnetometer data at http://flux.phys.uit.no/geomag.html, the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska at http://magnet.asf.alaska.edu/ for the Trapper Creek magnetometer data, and the Canadian Magnetic Observatory Network maintained and operated by the Geological Survey of Canada at https://www.geomag.nrcan.gc.ca/index-en.php for the Meanook magnerometer data used in this study. We also thank I.R. Mann, D.K. Milling, and the CARISMA team for the PINA and LCL magnetometer data obtained from http://data.carisma.ca, provided by the University of Alberta with founding from the Canadian Space Agency. We acknowledge the CXD team at LANL for GPS electron flux measurements freely available from NOAA at https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/spaceweather/satellite-data/satellitesystems/gps/. OMNI data is freely available from CDAWeb https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.564 | 0.272 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".