MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394122598 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13519181

Data and metadata supporting the article: Co-dependency for MET and FGFR1 in basal triple negative breast cancers

2021· dataset· en· W4394122598 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vanessa Y.C. Sung, Jennifer F. Knight, Radia Marie Johnson, Yaakov E. Stern, Sadiq A. Saleh, Paul Savage, Anie Monast, Dongmei Zuo, Stéphanie Duhamel, Morag Park

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFibroblast Growth Factor Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataTriple-negative breast cancerTriple negativeBasal (medicine)Dependency (UML)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebPsychologyBreast cancerMedicineInternal medicineCancerSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease that lacks both effective patient stratification strategies and therapeutic targets. Whilst elevated levels of the MET receptor tyrosine kinase are associated with TNBCs and predict poor clinical outcome, the functional role of MET in TNBC is still poorly understood. In this study, the authors utilized an established Met-dependent transgenic mouse model of TNBC, human cell lines, and patient-derived xenografts to investigate the role of MET in TNBC tumourigenesis.<br> <b>Data access</b>: Processed RNA sequencing datasets generated during the study, are available in Gene expression Omnibus: https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE162272. The raw RNA sequencing data are available in Sequence Read Archive: https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRP294504. All other datasets generated and analysed during the study (including tumoursphere formation assays, tumoursphere proliferation assays, immunohistochemistry data, quantitative RT-PCR, <i>in vivo</i> inhibitor treatments (including tumour volume calculations), flow cytometry data and immunofluorescence data) are publicly available in the figshare repository as part of this data record. The publicly available TCGA data analysed during the study are available in cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics: https://identifiers.org/cbioportal:brca_tcga_pub. Microarray data from the MMTV-Metmt;Trp53fl/+;Cre tumours analysed during the study, are available in Gene Expression Omnibus: https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE41601. RNA sequencing data from breast cancer pairs of primary tumors and PDXs, analysed during the study, are also available in Gene Expression Omnibus: https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE142767. Uncropped Western blots are part of the supplementary files that accompany the article.<br> <b>Study approval and patient consent: </b>All human participants provided informed consent for this study and tissue was collected at McGill University Health Center in accordance with the protocols approved by the research ethics board (SUR-99-780). All animal studies linked to this protocol were approved by the McGill University Animal Care Committee (2014-7514). The Biobank protocol (05-006) and the protocol to generate PDX from biobank tissues (14-168) were both approved by Jewish General Hospital ethics committee.<br> <b>Study aims and methodology: </b>In the present study, the authors assayed tumour-initiating cells (TIC) properties to directly investigate the role of Met in tumour initiation and identify FGFR1 signaling as a key convergent pathway with Met for the maintenance of TICs. Primary mouse cell lines were established by dissociation of MMTV-<i>Metmt</i>, <i>Trp53fl/+;Cre</i>, and MMTV-<i>Metmt;Trp53fl/+;Cre </i>mammary tumours as previously described. Additionally, the following cell lines were used during the study: BT-20, HCC70, HCC1937, HCC1954, HCC1395, MDA-MB-468, MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-157, MDA-MB-231, BT-549, and Hs578T. The following are described in more detail in the published article: cell culture, patient-derived xenografts, antibodies and reagents, lentiviral infection, tumoursphere formation assays, tumoursphere proliferation assays, Western blot analysis, quantitative RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, RNA sequencing, in vivo limiting dilution assay, <i>in vivo</i> inhibitor treatments, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, tumour dissociation, analysis of gene expression data, and statistical analysis.<br> <b>Data supporting the figures, supplementary figures and supplementary tables in the article: </b> This data record consists of a total of 38 data files in the following file formats: .xlsx, .pdf, .csv, .txt, .png and tiff. A list of all the datasets generated during the study, are included in the file <b>Sung, V. et al.xlsx.</b>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicFibroblast Growth Factor ResearchFrench-language works237,207