Additional file 6 of Cytogenetic screening of a Canadian swine breeding nucleus using a newly developed karyotyping method named oligo-banding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 6: Table S3. Correspondence between oligo-banding probes and G-bands and their positions on pig chromosomes. Oligo-banding probe positions are specified starting at the first nucleotide of the first oligonucleotide and ending at the last nucleotide of the last oligonucleotide. G-band positions were estimated by Donaldson et al. [1]. The centromere position relative to oligo-banding probes was confirmed on each chromosome pair. Discrepancy with Donaldson et al. [1] was observed on SSC6, SSC7 and Y. However, our centromere positions match those of Warr et al. [44]. When available, the regions closest to our positioning were included in the Predicted centromere region (start–end)** columns based on Warr et al. [44] results. A discrepancy was observed also for the SSC17 centromere position as Warr et al. [44] have detected it at the SSC17 end compared to our results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.399 | 0.094 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".