MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394211248 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.11708925

Neoproterozoic and Cambro-Ordovician magmatism: episodic growth and reworking of continental crust, Himachal Himalaya, India

2020· dataset· en· W4394211248 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rimpi Dhiman, Sandeep Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagmatismGeologyContinental crustOrdovicianCrustGeochemistryEarth sciencePaleontologyPetrologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U-Pb SHRIMP and LA-MC-ICP-MS zircon dates from Dalhousie and Dhauladhar granite yield weighted mean ages of 900 to 700 Ma for magmatic cores. The rim has an age of 460 Ma age, representing the time of reworking of early Neoproterozoic bodies during Cambro-Ordovician time. The plutons are composed of granite, monzogranite, and granodioritic having a peraluminous character with pronounced Eu anomaly. Higher Rb content and Rb/Sr ratio along with REE enrichment in Dalhousie granite show that the body is more evolved than Dhauladhar granite. New U-Pb data from Dalhousie and Dhauladhar areas suggest that Cambro-Ordovician continental magmatism took place within the Greater India by reworking of already existing Neoproterozoic granite. These two magmatic episodes can be correlated with the amalgamation of Gondwanaland over granite that formed during the Rodinia break-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→