MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394244609 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3507536

An approximate maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of sequenced streptomycetes (Nerwick format)

2016· dataset· en· W4394244609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryan F. Seipke

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeTree (set theory)Maximum likelihoodBiologyTree rearrangementComputer scienceGenealogyMathematicsStatisticsCombinatoricsGeneticsHistoryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the phylogenetic tree (in Nerwick format) described in the following manuscript submitted to Chemical Science: Formicamycins, antibacterial polyketides produced by Streptomyces formicae isolated from African Tetraponera plant-ants Zhiwei Qin1, John T Munnoch2, Rebecca Devine2, Neil A Holmes2, Ryan F Seipke3, Barrie Wilkinson1* and Matthew I Hutchings2* 1Department of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. 2School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. 3School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom. *Contact: m.hutchings@uea.ac.uk or @matthutchings10 and barrie.wilkinson@jic.ac.uk ESI Figure 4. An approximate maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of sequenced streptomycetes. A phylogeny was inferred for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 573 sequenced streptomycetes based on concatenated partial sequences for atpD-rpoB. FastTree local support values are indicated at each node.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→