MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394282909 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19721709

Offshore Island Connection Line: A new perspective of coastal urban development boundary simulation and multi-scenario prediction

2022· dataset· en· W4394282909 on OpenAlexaff
Fei He, Jun Yang, Yuqing Zhang, Dongqi Sun, Li Wang, Xiangming Xiao, Jianhong Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelinePerspective (graphical)Connection (principal bundle)Line (geometry)Boundary (topology)Development (topology)GeographyGeologyMarine engineeringOceanographyComputer scienceEngineeringGeometryArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urban development boundary (UDB) is a core issue in territorial spatial planning and remains a research focus in urban development. However, in the past, land use simulations of coastal cities have had some limitations. For example, new urban land outside the research boundary could not be effectively simulated, resulting in a large gap between the simulation results and reality. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) cellular automata (CA) model based on a new perspective, the Offshore Island Connection Line (collectively, OICL-ANN-CA), was developed to address this problem. We first proposed the delineation principles and methods of OICL and applied it to the Jinpu New Area of Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China. Based on the conversion probability and land use simulation results obtained by ANN and CA, this study validated the UDB simulations for 2000–2020 in the Jinpu New Area and predicted the UDB for 2020–2035 under three scenarios: historical inertia development, ecological security protection, and ecological and economic balance. The results indicate that, compared with the traditional perspective model (the ANN-CA model based on the sea–land boundary), the OICL-ANN-CA model exhibited better simulation accuracy (the figure of merit was approximately 35% higher) and effectively simulated new urban land outside the traditional boundary. This simulation of urban land expansion is more consistent with recent development in the study area. In addition, the predicted results of UDB in 2035 also demonstrate the benefits of this model for detecting reclaimed land. This study illustrates that the OICL-ANN-CA model is a more capable method for capturing changes in new coastal urban land and can produce realistic simulations. It provides a reference for delimiting the UDB and defining the research boundary for the Jinpu New Area and other fast-growing coastal cities in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicCoastal and Marine Management→French-language works237,207→