MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394289063 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20342111

Additional file 2 of How compassionate communities are implemented and evaluated in practice: a scoping review

2022· review· en· W4394289063 on OpenAlexaff
Katia Dumont, Isabelle Marcoux, Émilie Warren, Farah Alem, Bea Alvar, Gwenvaël Ballu, Anitra Bostock, S. Robin Cohen, Serge Daneault, Véronique Dubé, Janie Houle, Asma Minyaoui, Ghislaine Rouly, Dale Weil, Allan Kellehear, Antoine Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalJewish General HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 2. Description of included studies. Includes the titles of the selected studies, years, countries, population types and contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.082
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.082
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0140.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8270.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.524
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.015 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsFrench-language works237,207