MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394301480 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3527246

Appendix A. Tables showing climatic factors influencing the INDVI in May, the maximum NDVI increase and the average slope of NDVI between early May and early July in three study sites in Alberta, climatic factors influencing the INDVI in May, the maximum NDVI increase, and the average slope in NDVI between early May and early July, and correlation coefficients between climatic variables for the GPNP (Italy); and model selection procedures. Also included are figures showing interannual...

2016· dataset· en· W4394301480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathalie Pettorelli, Fanie Pelletier, Achaz von Hardenberg, Marco Festa‐Bianchet, Steeve D. Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexPhysical geographyEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeologyClimate changeOceanographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tables showing climatic factors influencing the INDVI in May, the maximum NDVI increase and the average slope of NDVI between early May and early July in three study sites in Alberta, climatic factors influencing the INDVI in May, the maximum NDVI increase, and the average slope in NDVI between early May and early July, and correlation coefficients between climatic variables for the GPNP (Italy); and model selection procedures. Also included are figures showing interannual variations in NDVI during the study periods and maximum increase in NDVI from 1982 to 2004 in four study sites in Alberta and Italy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1890.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→