Identification of differential DNA methylation alterations of ovarian cancer in peripheral whole blood based on within-sample relative methylation orderings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leukocyte cell proportion changes affect the detection of cancer-associated aberrant DNA methylation alterations in peripheral blood samples. We aimed to detect cellular DNA methylation changes in ovarian cancer (OVC) blood samples avoiding the above-mentioned cell-composition effects. Based on the within-sample relative methylation orderings (RMOs) of CpG loci in leukocyte subtypes, we developed the Ref-RMO method to detect aberrant methylation alterations from OVC blood samples. Stable CpG pairs with consistent RMOs in different leukocyte subtypes were determined, more than 99% of which retained their RMO patterns in peripheral whole blood (PWB) in independent datasets. Based on the stable CpG pairs, significantly reversed CpG pairs were detected from OVC PWB samples, which were relative to clinical information such as age, subtype, grade, stage, or CA125 level. Results showed 439 CpG loci were determined to be significant differential DNA methylations between OVC and healthy blood samples. They were mainly enriched in KEGG pathways, such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, apoptosis, proteoglycans in cancer, and immune-associated Gene Ontology terms. STRING analysis showed that they tended to have functional interactions with cancer-associated genes recorded in the COSMIC database. Leukocyte cellular differential DNA methylations could be identified by the proposed RMO-based method from OVC PWB samples, which were cancer-associated aberrant signals against cell-composition effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".