The pathological involvement of spinal cord EphB2 in visceral sensitization in male rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are usually at an increased risk for chronic disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), characterized by hyperalgesia and allodynia, but its subsequent effect on visceral hyperalgesia and the mechanism remain unclear. The present study employed single prolonged stress (SPS), a model of PTSD-pain comorbidity, behavioral evaluation, intrathecal drug delivery, immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and RT-PCR techniques. When detecting visceral sensitivity, the score of the abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) induced by graded colorectal distention (CRD) was used. The AWR score was reduced in the SPS day 1 group but increased in the SPS day 7 and SPS day 14 groups at 40 mmHg and 60 mmHg, and the score was increased significantly with EphrinB1-Fc administration. The EphB2+ cell density and EphB2 protein and mRNA levels were downregulated in the SPS day 1 group and then upregulated significantly in the SPS day 7 group; these changes were more noticeable with EphrinB1-Fc administration compared with the SPS-only group. The C-Fos-positive reaction induced by SPS was mainly localized in neurons of the spinal dorsal horn, in which the C-Fos-positive cell density and its protein and mRNA levels were upregulated on SPS days 7 and 14; these changes were statistically significant in the SPS + EphrinB1-Fc group compared with the SPS alone group. The present study confirmed the time window for the AWR value, EphB2 and C-Fos changes, and the effect of EphrinB1-Fc on these changes, which suggests that spinal cord EphB2 activation exacerbates visceral pain after SPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".