MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394339417 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21825365

Control of Lean Blowout in a Swirl-Stabilized Dump Combustor at Different Levels of Premixing Based on Flame Colour

2023· dataset· en· W4394339417 on OpenAlexaff
Somnath De, Arijit Bhattacharya, Achintya Mukhopadhyay, Swarnendu Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustorEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceWaste managementProcess engineeringAutomotive engineeringNuclear engineeringChemistryEngineeringCombustion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presently, the use of lean combustion has been growing in industrial furnaces, aero-engine, and rocket engine applications due to their low NOX emission and minimum maintenance requirements. On the other hand, due to the excessively low combustion reaction rate, the operation at a low fuel–air ratio leads to the sudden shutdown of the engines, which is termed lean blowout (LBO). Therefore, to operate land-based and aircraft engines at an extremely lean fuel–air mixture, control of LBO has become indispensable. In the present work, we develop several feedback in-loop control strategies using a pixel-averaged intensity ratio between the red and blue components of the flame emission. During a lean operation, based on the quantification of the proximity of the combustion dynamics to the LBO limits using this color ratio, the control strategies make the solenoid valves active to inject a secondary pilot fuel and energize the flame base. We notice that a proper choice of the color ratio as a threshold enhances the stability of both premixed and partially premixed combustion using a low pilot fuel. Besides, we test NOX emission for unpiloted and piloted operations and find that the emission is only marginally affected during a pilot injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207