The complete chloroplast genome of <i>Aster altaicus</i> Willd. (Asteraceae: <i>Aster</i>) and phylogenetic analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aster altaicus Willd. is an important medicinal plant and can also be used as a forage grass. To better understand the diversity and phylogeny between A. altaicus and other Aster species, we sequenced and annotated the complete chloroplast genome of A. altaicus by using the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform. This complete chloroplast genome is 152,473 bp long and the GC content is 37.3% presented a negative AT-skew (–0.002) and a positive GC-skew (0.003). The genome contains a large single-copy region (LSC) of 84,235 bp, a small single-copy region (SSC) of 18,212 bp, which separated by a pair of inverted repeat regions (IRA and IRB) of 25,013 bp. Moreover, 129 genes were found in the chloroplast of A. altaicus, including 85 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 36 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), 8 ribosomal RNA unit genes (rRNAs). Phylogenetic analysis showed that A. altaicus was more closely related to A. altaicus and A. altaicus var. uchiyamae. This study lays the foundation for further studies on the evolution and phylogeny of Aster.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".