MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394354300 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5469427

Aetiology of stemphylium blight on lentil in Canada

2017· dataset· en· W4394354300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kiela B. Caudillo-Ruiz, Vijai Bhadauria, Sabine Banniza

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2017
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlightHorticultureEtiologyBiologyAgronomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field isolates of <i>Stemphylium</i> spp. collected from lentil and nine other western Canadian crops were compared to the ex-type isolate of <i>Stemphylium botryosum</i> by morphology and by molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the <i>glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase</i> gene regions. Sequence data of these genes for six other <i>Stemphylium</i> spp. obtained from GenBank were also included in the phylogenetic analysis. Morphology of colonies and morphometry of conidia agreed with previous descriptions of <i>S. botryosum</i>, but did not correlate with the clustering observed in the phylogenetic analysis. Sequence data revealed that <i>S. botryosum</i> is one of probably two <i>Stemphylium</i> spp. involved in the development of stemphylium blight on Canadian lentil, and is associated with other hosts such as faba bean, soybean, bean, pea, alfalfa, coriander, caraway and fenugreek. More than one validly described <i>Stemphylium</i> sp. was associated with the second cluster of isolates causing stemphylium blight, indicating that an extensive taxonomic review of the genus <i>Stemphylium</i> is required before this second stemphylium blight pathogen can be identified by name.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207