Alkaline phosphatase: reference interval transference from CALIPER to a pediatric Brazilian population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction: Interpreting laboratory tests requires reference intervals (RI) that may vary between different populations. For the diagnosis of hypophosphatasia (HPP), lower limits of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels must be determined. Objective: To transfer the RI findings for ALP obtained by the Canadian Laboratory Initiative in Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) in children and adolescents, adjusted for the Brazilian population. Methods: The ALP measures from 1690 subjects (aging from 1-18 years) were analyzed. The CALIPER subgroups and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline were used for validation. Inclusion criteria were patients with normal range of hepatic and renal function, bone metabolism, and blood counts. Exclusion criteria were hospitalization, low weight, and use of drugs that could interfere in the ALP measurement and patients in with more than three orders for ALP measuring test. The RI obtained were considered valid if more than 90% of patients were whitin of the CALIPER RI. Results: The ALP RI results (IU/l) obtained were: 149-301 for both sexes aged 1-9 years; 127-326 for both sexes aged 10-12 years; 62-212 for girls and 129-437 for boys aged 13-14 years; 52-120 for girls and 78-268 for boys aged 15-16 years; 45-97 for girls and 40-129 for boys aged 17-18 years. In 92.4% of the patients, the results were comparable with those of the CALIPER study. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that the ALP RI for Brazilian children and adolescents are comparable to the CALIPER study in 92.4% of the patients and can be used for this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.309 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".