MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394389871 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15170949

<i>Z</i>-score of some pulsed-wave Doppler indices of right pulmonary artery segments of normal fetuses in the second and third trimestries

2021· dataset· en· W4394389871 on OpenAlexaff
Weida Liu, Xianchen Wang, Na Li, Mei Pan, Bei Wang, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Bowen Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoppler effectFetusCardiologyInternal medicineMedicinePulmonary arteryAnatomyPhysicsBiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To establish the Z-score equation of right pulmonary artery (RPA) segments for some valuable pulse-wave Doppler parameters (PWD) and estimate their reference ranges in normal fetuses. Two hundred and seventy-three normal singleton fetuses at 18–38 weeks were enrolled in this fetal echocardiography of a prospective cross-sectional study. The proximal, middle, and distal segments of RPA of pulsed-wave Doppler parameters, such as peak systolic velocity (PSV) and pulsation index (PI) were obtained by using fetal Doppler echocardiography. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of each parameter and gestational age (GA) were analyzed by regression, and the optimal model of Z-score was established. There was a significant correlation between fetal pulmonary artery Doppler parameters and gestational age, during the whole pregnancy, PI showed a downward trend with the progress of gestational week, while PSV showed an upward trend. Whether it was the original data or the data converted for the normal distribution of Z-score, the model that best described the mean value of parameters was quadratic regression. The SDs for PSV of the middle segment was a linear equation, others were constants. From proximal to distal of RPA, PSV showed a decreasing trend while PI showed an increasing trend. Z-score models and reference values for some PWD parameters of three segments of RPA were proposed against GA, which may quantitatively assess the flow dynamics of fetal RPA and quantitatively assess fetal lung circulation development and hemodynamic changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→