MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4394391143 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3207697

Life histories for 94 chondrichthyans used to calculate updated estimates of maximum intrinsic rate of population increase

2016· dataset· en· W4394391143 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sebastián A. Pardo, Holly K. Kindsvater, John D. Reynolds, Nicholas K. Dulvy

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationStatisticsEnvironmental scienceMathematicsEconometricsBiologyDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset includes life history parameters for 94 chondrichthyans used to calculate updated estimates of maximum intrinsic rate of population increase (rmax) as shown in Pardo et al. (2016). The data here was primarily obtained from Garcia et al. (2008), however we have excluded species from their dataset that did not have values for maximum age or litter size. We have included life history parameters for the Basking Shark (Cetorhinus maximus). Life history traits included are maximum size (length_max), von Bertalanffy growth coefficient (k), age at maturity (age_mat), maximum age (age_max), average lifespan (ave_lifespan) which was defined as the midpoint between age at maturity and maximum age, litter size (l), and breeding interval (i). This dataset includes three different rmax estimates: published estimates of rmax based on the method outlined in Garcia et al. (2008) (rmax_published_previous), rmax estimates we recalculated using the method outlined in Garcia et al. (2008) (rmax_previous_recalc), and updated rmax estimates we calculated using the method outlined in Pardo et al. (2016) (rmax_updated_recalc). Given that there are slight discrepancies in rmax estimates for a few species between published values from Garcia et al. (2008) and our recalculated estimates using their methodology, we used our own rmax recalculation using the previous method to compare with our rmax estimates based on our updated method. References: García VB, Lucifora LO, Myers RA (2008) The importance of habitat and life history to extinction risk in sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 275: 83-89. Pardo SA, Kindsvater HK, Reynolds JD, Dulvy NK. Maximum intrinsic rate of population increase in sharks, rays, and chimaeras: the importance of survival to maturity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0069.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→