MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

patients metadata

2022· dataset· en· W4394404081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Firdous Samreen

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sunnybrook Cardiac Data (SCD), also known as the 2009 Cardiac MR Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge data, consist of 45 cine-MRI images from a mixed of patients and pathologies: healthy, hypertrophy, heart failure with infarction and heart failure without infarction. Subset of this data set was first used in the automated myocardium segmentation challenge from short-axis MRI, held by a MICCAI workshop in 2009. The whole complete data set is now available in the CAP database with public domain license. Classification There are four pathological groups in this data set, which were classified based on (K Alfakih et al., JMRI 2003) paper, i.e.: Heart failure with infarction (HF-I) group had ejection fraction (EF) < 40% and evidence of late gadolinium (Gd) enhancement. Heart failure without infarction (HF) group had EF < 40% and no late Gd enhancement. LV hypertrophy (HYP) group had normal EF (> 55%) and a ratio of left ventricular (LV) mass over body surface area is > 83 g/m2. Healthy (N) group had EF > 55% and no hypertrophy. The following table shows group statistics written as average (stddev) : Availability The Cardiac Atlas Project provides the dissemination of the Sunnybrook data by hosting them in the CAP databases. Finite element models (see supporting files section below) derived from these data are also provided. The whole complete data are available for any users, including the guest user account. License and attribution of these data set, including its derivatives, follows the Public Domain (CC0 1.0 Universal). If you are using this data in a publication, please cite the following reference: Radau P, Lu Y, Connelly K, Paul G, Dick AJ, Wright GA. “Evaluation Framework for Algorithms Segmenting Short Axis Cardiac MRI.” The MIDAS Journal – Cardiac MR Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge, http://hdl.handle.net/10380/3070 Data contributor Perry Radau – Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. More information The original 2009 LV Segmentation Challenge webpage. Promotional poster for the 2009 LV Segmentation Challenge. The challenge results published in the MIDAS journal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5090.292

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.407
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.097 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementation→French-language works237,207→