MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394420165 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3846702

Abundance and Variety of Plant Species in Grassland

2016· dataset· en· W4394420165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nargol Ghazian

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrasslandAbundance (ecology)Variety (cybernetics)EcologyPlant speciesEnvironmental scienceGeographyBiologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset was collected on September 21st, 2016 in the grasslands of York University, Toronto, ON. Data was collected using a rectangular, pvc piping quadrat. In order for the samples to be selected free of bias, a random number generator was used. The quadrat was placed a total of 25 times in various areas of the grassland.<br>-All data except "Quadrat Number" and "Number of Different Species" is in percentages. -If vegetation did not cover 100% of the quadrat, there was the presence of other item(s) (e.x. soil/dirt).-N/A=Not Applicable (meaning the species was not present in the quadrant).-Percentages of various plant species seen add up to a total of 100% (Note: this 100% is only out of the vegetated fraction of the quadrat).<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207