Quasi-Newton Acceleration of EM and MM Algorithms via Broyden’s Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The principle of majorization-minimization (MM) provides a general framework for eliciting effective algorithms to solve optimization problems. However, the resulting methods often suffer from slow convergence, especially in large-scale and high-dimensional data settings. This has motivated several acceleration schemes tailored for MM algorithms, but many existing approaches are either problem-specific, or rely on approximations and heuristics loosely inspired by the optimization literature. We propose a novel quasi-Newton method for accelerating any valid MM algorithm, cast as seeking a fixed point of the MM algorithm map. The method does not require specific information or computation from the objective function or its gradient, and enjoys a limited-memory variant amenable to efficient computation in high-dimensional settings. By rigorously connecting our approach to Broyden’s classical root-finding methods, we establish convergence guarantees and identify conditions for linear and super-linear convergence. These results are validated numerically and compared to peer methods in a thorough empirical study, showing that it achieves state-of-the-art performance across a diverse range of problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".