A hypoxia related long non-coding RNA signature could accurately predict survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypoxia plays a significant role in tumor progression. This study aimed to develop a hypoxia-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) signature for predicting survival outcomes of patients with bladder cancer (BC). The transcriptome and clinicopathologic data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Univariate Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression analysis were used to screened lncRNAs. Ten lncRNAs were screened out and included into the hypoxia lncRNA signature. The risk score based on hypoxia lncRNA signature could accurately predict the survival outcomes of BC patients. Immune infiltration analysis showed that six types of immune cells had significant different infiltration. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis showed that the risk scores between the wild types and the mutation types of TP53, FGFR3, and RB1 were significantly different. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showed that cancer-associated pathways belonged to the high risk groups and immune-related signal pathways were enriched into the low risk group. Then, we constructed a predictive model with the risk score, age, and clinical stage, which showed a robust prognostic performance. An lncRNA-mRNA coexpression network was constructed, which contained 62 lncRNA-mRNA links among 10 lncRNAs and 40 related mRNAs. In summary, the hypoxia lncRNA signature could accurately predict prognosis, chemotherapy and immunotherapy response in patients with BC and was relevant to clinicopathologic parameters and immune cell infiltration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".