MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394451372 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3833247

Introduction to Ecology - A study on the relationship between hair colour and gender

2016· dataset· en· W4394451372 on OpenAlex
Vanessa Guo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methods: In order to assess the relationship between hair colour and gender, 22 students enrolled in Ecology at York University were surveyed. Data was collected and entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.<br>Study Site: This study took place on September 15, 2016 in Room 118 of the Lumbers building at York University Keele Campus in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. <br>Hypothesis: There is no corelation between hair colour and gender because the genes that code for hair colour are not related to the genes that code for gender. <br>Predictions:<br>1) There will be no corelation between hair colour and gender because they are independent traits2) The distribution of hair colour will vary across males and females of different ethnicity and race3) Hair dyes can change someones natural hair colour coded by their genes <br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it