MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394459058 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1517806

Human Resources Development and the status of Women Labor Force in Saudi Arabia – A Critical Analysis

2015· dataset· en· W4394459058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Riyazuddin Qureshi

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in MENA
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman resourcesBusinessDemographic economicsEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Saudi Arabia is branded as an ultra-conservative country by global as well as domestic media where the status of women is alleged to be very pathetic. Amani Hamdan, a Saudi scholar affiliated to the University of Western Ontario, Canada, published her research titled, “Women and education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and achievements”. Amani Hamdan quoted Lacey’s findings as, “reform in Saudi Arabia had never been a simple matter……….”. During the past decade the Saudi government laid emphasis on developing its human capital. Since the year 2000, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia invested more than triple the amount of what it has invested in the year 2000. These progressive strategies to develop its HR and particularly to empower women will surely present remarkable results in next five years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicSocioeconomic Development in MENAFrench-language works237,207