MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Model For Sea Lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) Dynamics In A Seasonally Changing Environment

2015· dataset· en· W4394462880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew A. Rittenhouse

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLepeophtheirusDynamics (music)FisheryBiologyEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>AquaculturePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project contains R code to replicate the results of our modelling research on sea lice. The file, Marty_Data.csv, is a .csv conversion of data from Marty et al. (2010), DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009573108. The file, RittenhouseEtAl_eggviability, fits a linear model to salinity and egg viability data from Johnson & Albright (1991). The file, RittenhouseEtAl_ModelDynamics.R produces figure 2 and figure 3 of our manuscript. The file, RittenhouseEtAl_SensitivityAnalysis.R, produces our sensitivity analysis results and figure 5 of our manuscript. The file, RittenhouseEtAl_SiteEnvironment, fits sinusoidal models to temperature and salinity data from British Columbia (Marty_Data.csv) and Newfoundland(not included), and finds the the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of the temperature and salinity data at these two sites. The file, RittenhouseEtAl_R0t, finds R0(t) for the two sites as well as mortality rates and maturation times. The file, RittenhouseEtAl_CaseStudyFigure creates figure 4 of the main text. For legal reasons, we unfortunately can not include data from our Newfoundland case study site. As such, errors will be returned on the RittenhouseEtAl_SiteEnvironment.R and RittenhouseEtAl_CaseStudyFigure.R files. The information for the British Columbia site, as well as panels A, B, and C of figure 5 are still able to be replicated without this data. The files, RittenhouseEtAl_SiteEnvironment.R and RittenhouseEtAl.R0t.R should be run before RittenhouseEtAl_CaseStudyFigure.R. The files are meant to be placed in the same file and run in the following order and manner: rm(list = ls()) # clear workspace setwd() # Set this to folder's location source("RittenhouseEtAl_eggviability.R") rm(list = ls()) # clear workspace setwd() # Set this to folder's location source("RittenhouseEtAl_ModelDynamics.R") rm(list = ls()) # clear workspace setwd() # Set this to folder's location source("RittenhouseEtAl_SensitivityAnalysis.R") rm(list = ls()) # clear workspace setwd() # Set this to folder's location source("RittenhouseEtAl_SiteEnvironment.R") rm(list = ls()) # clear workspace setwd() # Set this to folder's location source("RittenhouseEtAl_R0t.R") rm(list = ls()) # clear workspace setwd() # Set this to folder's location source("RittenhouseEtAl_CaseStudyFigure.R")

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→