MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394470897 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12126462

CA-TP4 Soil Respiration Data 2008-2018

2020· dataset· en· W4394470897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Altaf Arain

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil respirationRespirationEnvironmental scienceBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil CO2 emissions or soil respiration (Rs) data were measured at an eastern white pine forest (Pinus strobus L.) planted in 1939 as monoculture stands north of Lake Erie in southern Ontario, Canada. The forest site is part of the Turkey Point Observatory and has been associated with AmeriFlux and global Fluxnet initiatives, where it is known as CA-TP4. The forest is dominated (>82%) by eastern white pine, while other tree species include 11% balsam fir (Abies balsamea L. Mill) and species native to the hardwood forests of North American Eastern Temperate Forest Ecoregion, including 4% Oak (Quercus velutina L., Q. alba L.), 2 % Red Maple (Acer rubrum L.) and some wild black cherry trees (Prunus serotina Ehrh). The forest was thinned in 1983 and winter of 2012, where one-third of trees were randomly removed. Soil CO2 efflux was measured using an automated non-steady state chamber system developed by the University of British Columbia in a 50 m × 50 m area located 100 m north from the eddy covariance flux tower at the site from June 2008 to October 2018. Initially four chambers were installed. One measured heterotrophic respiration (FRT1) in the trenched plot whereby live tree roots were removed from surrounding area and other three as controls. chambers and measured total soil CO2 efflux (FS: FS1, FS2, and FS22). One of the control chambers (FS22) was altered in May 2009 to measure the contributions from the mineral-soil horizon (FLR) to total soil respiration, by removing the litter layer. In May 2009, two more control chambers (FS3 and FS4) were added to the chamber system to measure total soil respiration. Finally, in May 2010, two additional chambers were installed, one as a control (FS5) and an additional chamber to measure heterotrophic respiration (FRT2); increasing the total number of chambers in the chamber system to eight. In total, five chambers were measuring total soil CO2 efflux, two chambers measured heterotrophic soil CO2 efflux and one chamber measured contributions from the mineral-soil horizon. Each chamber consisted of a PVC collar and a chamber lid that fit onto the collar. The collars were inserted approximately 2 to 4 cm into the ground. The chamber lid consisted of a transparent plastic dome fixed to a metal frame. Each chamber closed individually for a one-minute interval, where the CO2 concentration was sampled and measured by an infrared gas analyzer (model LI-840, Li-COR Inc.). Measurements were cycled through the eight collars for a total of three cycles per half-hour period. Each half-hour average consisted of three, minute-long CO2 concentration measurements per chamber. One half-hourly value was produced for each collar by averaging the three measurements taken during that half-hour. The measurement chambers remained open when not taking measurements. Throughout the growing season, any vegetation growth was removed from inside the collars to eliminate potential photosynthesis effects. Chamber 1: Reference plot (then converted to litterless in May 8, 2009) Chamber 2: Reference plot Chamber 3: Heterotrophic plot (trenched at the time of instalation in 2008 to exclude live roots). Chamber 4: Drought plot (90% rainfall exclusion from 1 April to 3 July, 2009 in a 20m x 20m plot) Chamber 5: Reference plot (installed in May 2009) Chamber 6: Drought plot (installed in May 2009) (90% rainfall exclusion from 1 April to 3 July, 2009 in a 20m x 20m plot). Chamber 7: Reference plot (installed in May 2010 ) Chamber 8: Reference plot (converted to heterotrophic in May 2010 by trenching and excluding live roots) Tree density is 413 (321) tree per ha, Leaf Area Index is 8.5 (5.3), tree heigh 23.4 (22.9) m, and diamter at breat heigh is 39 (37.2) m. Numbers in paranthesis show vales after 2012 thinning. Topography in the area is predominantly flat with occasional 0.5-3.0% undulating slopes. The soil at the site is well drained with a low water holding capacity and classified as brunisolic grey-brown luvisols in the Canadian System of Soil Classification and is composed of ~98% sand. The climate in the region is cool temperate with a 30-year mean annual temperature of 8.0 °C and mean annual precipitation of 1036 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207