MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394474862 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20329326

Additional file 1 of Gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate/glutamine levels in the dentate nucleus and periaqueductal gray with episodic and chronic migraine: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study

2022· dataset· en· W4394474862 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei Wang, Xueyan Zhang, Xiaoyan Bai, Yingkui Zhang, Ziyu Yuan, Hefei Tang, Zhiye Li, Zhangxuan Hu, Yaqing Zhang, Xueying Yu, Binbin Sui, Yonggang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriaqueductal grayGlutamate receptorNucleusDentate nucleusgamma-Aminobutyric acidNeuroscienceNuclear magnetic resonanceProton magnetic resonanceChemistryBiologyBiochemistryPhysicsCentral nervous systemReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Associations between headache frequency and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between headache frequency and the GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between headache frequency and the Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between headache frequency and the GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between headache frequency and the Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S2. Associations between disease duration and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between disease duration and the GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between disease duration and the Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between disease duration and the GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between disease duration and the Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S3. Associations between the MIDAS score and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between the MIDAS score and GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between the MIDAS score and Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between the MIDAS score and GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the MIDAS score and Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. MIDAS, migraine disability assessment scale; PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S4. Associations between the HIT-6 score and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between the HIT-6 score and GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between the HIT-6 score and Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between the HIT-6 score and GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the HIT-6 score and Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. HIT-6, Headache Impact Test; PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S5. Associations between the PHQ-9 score and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between the PHQ-9 score and GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between the PHQ-9 score and Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between the PHQ-9 score and GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the PHQ-9 score and Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S6. Associations between the GAD-7 score and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between the GAD-7 score and GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between the GAD-7 score and Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between the GAD-7 score and GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the GAD-7 score and Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S7. Associations between the PSQI score and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between the PSQI score and GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between the PSQI score and Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between the PSQI score and GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the PSQI score and Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine. Fig. S8. Associations between the MoCA score and neurochemical levels. (A) and (B) show the correlation between the MoCA score and GABA level in the PAG. (C) and (D) show the correlation between the MoCA score and Glx level in the PAG. (E) and (F) show the correlation between the MoCA score and GABA level in the DN. (G) and (H) show the correlation between the MoCA score and Glx level in the DN. Dots represent participants with migraine. The black regression line represents Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Gray shading represents the 95% confidence intervals of the partial correlations. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PAG, periaqueductal gray; DN, dentate nucleus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; Glx, glutamate/glutamine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8100.068

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207